AEF has formally responded to the Airport Commission’s paper on passenger forecasting, and to the invitation to comment on the ‘sifting criteria’ that should be used to assess proposals for new airport development.
Our forecasting response (scroll down to download) argues that:
Our submission on sifting criteria (also below) makes clear AEF’s view that environmental – and especially climate change – factors suggest that no new airport capacity should be built in the near future. It argued, however, that to the extent that the Commission must assess the feasibility of airport expansion options in the longer term, environmental criteria should be part of the initial sift.
The paper notes that the Heathrow area remains in breach of EU laws on nitrogen dioxide pollution and that any proposal to increase activity in such an area would be sure to face legal challenge. And it argues that with people now affected by aircraft noise at lower levels than was the case in the past, the traditional threshold of 57 Leq for the onset of significant community annoyance is no longer valid and cannot be relied on when assessing the impacts of the various proposals that the Commission will doubtless receive.