Skip to content

New Scientific Analysis on Climate Impact of Aviation Emissions Finds Immediate Adoption of Global Market Based Measure Required

A new scientific report1 released today highlights the critical importance of taking early action when implementing measures to reduce the climate impact of rapidly increasing emissions from aviation.  With a decision expected shortly on how and when to tackle international aviation emissions, this new report increases the pressure on the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) (the United Nations agency responsible) not to defer a decision on the adoption of a market-based measure (MBM).

Over the past 2 years momentum had been building towards a decision at the 38th ICAO General Assembly, scheduled to begin in Montreal in late September2, on the need for an effective global MBM. But political differences amongst key states now threaten yet again a decision this year on how and when the sector should address its growing contribution to climate change – the next Assembly is not until 2016.

The report by Manchester Metropolitan University’s Centre for Air Transport and Environment (CATE) “Mitigating future aviation CO2 emissions – timing is everything” shows that the real climate benefit of any action depends on the cumulative emission reductions between now and a future date, and not just on achieving a certain amount of emission reductions by a specific year (as ICAO has focused on): CO2 has a long lifetime so concentration levels are determined by cumulative emissions over time. Early reductions result in a lower emissions trajectory than equivalent annual savings made at a later date.  

The report shows that while the technology, operations  and alternative fuels measures that are ICAO’s focus have the potential to make significant reductions in the climate impact of emissions from aviation, these will only come in the longer term given the lead times needed to develop and bring to market whereas immediate reductions from effective market based measures implemented now far outweigh the climate impacts of ICAO’s approach: the report shows that a global MBM such as emissions trading introduced in 2012 and the existing European Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS) for aviation provide the largest single incremental improvements in radiative forcing (RF)3 and temperature response by 2050 (a 30.1% improvement in RF for a global MBM and around 15% in RF for the EU ETS compared to a business as usual scenario based on technology and operational improvements). Based on best estimates of likely future uptake, biofuels would have a minimal climate impact by 2050.

Commenting on the report’s conclusions Bill Hemmings of T&E4 said “This robust analysis is compelling and should be a wake-up call to States and industry as they prepare for ICAO’s Assembly. ICAO’s traditional approach focussing on technology, operations and biofuels falls far short of what is needed”.

Meanwhile, Tim Johnson of AEF5 said “ICAO has already demonstrated that its own modest goal of carbon neutral growth by 2020 will be impossible to achieve without market-based measures, while the scale of reductions required to contribute towards a 2 degree pathway reinforces that argument unequivocally.  It’s time to stop debating the ‘if’ and focus on the ‘how’.”

ENDS

For further information, please contact:

Tim Johnson, Director, Aviation Environment Federation: +44 (0) 7710 381 742

Bill Hemmings, Aviation Manager, Transport & Environment: +32 (0) 487 582 706

Notes for Editors

1. Mitigating future aviation CO2 emissions – “timing is everything”, by Prof D. Lee, Dr B. Owen & Dr L Lim, Manchester Metropolitan University, August 2013: http://www.cate.mmu.ac.uk/projects/mitigating-future-aviation-co2-emissions-timing-is-everything/

Effect of mitigation options on CO2 radiative forcing to 2050 attributable to international aviation (source MMU, 2013):

LeeFig4a

CO2 radiative forcing savings for international aviation from business-as-usual (BAU) technology and operations improvements in combination with different mitigation options, compared with the business-as-usual (BAU) scenario (source MMU, 2013):

LeeFig5

2. The ICAO Assembly begins on the 24 September and runs through to 4 October; prior to the Assembly, ICAO’s Council will hold an extraordinary meeting to consider MBMs on 4 September.

3. Radiative forcing is the science-based metric of the climate impact of emissions – see Assessment Reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

4. T&E is the European Federation for Transport and Environment, a Brussels-based environmental NGO and a founding member of the International Coalition for Sustainable Aviation (ICSA) set up to provide NGOs with observer status to ICAO.

5. AEF is the Aviation Environment Federation, a London-based environmental NGO and also a founding member of ICSA.

Related articles

Aviation biofuels and the renewable transport fuels obligation

Flightpath 1.5 campaign launches 100 days after the Paris Agreement to urge the UN to tackle aviation’s CO2 emissions